Most of these utilizing a 2019 Mac Professional ought to change to the Mac Studio, somewhat than the 2023 Mac Professional, argues Macworld videographer and gamer Thiago Trevisan.
He argues that there’s just one cause to decide on the present Mac Professional over the far more compact Mac Studio, even though the 2019 mannequin was “the very best workstation [he has] ever owned” …
Again in April, 9to5Mac videographers Jeff Benjamin and Miles Somerville each praised the Mac Studio – even observing that you simply don’t essentially have to splurge for the Extremely model.
Even the bottom Mac Studio is a good general pc and an enormous step up in usability over any M1 Mac that Apple sells. It options far more I/O than both of the opposite Apple Silicon-powered desktop choices, runs quieter than any of the corporate’s laptops, and options comparatively beneficiant specs for the $1,999 base mannequin.
When guys who create phenomenally spectacular movies day after day charge a machine for video enhancing, you realize it needs to be good.
Macworld’s Thiago Trevisan has now echoed that view, after trialling the machine towards his impressively specced 2019 Mac Professional.
Right here’s one real-world instance: I took a 20-minute clip of R3D Uncooked 6K video and exported it to ProRes 422 HQ. The 2019 Intel Mac Professional with a 28-core CPU and the Radeon Professional W6800X Duo graphics had the identical pace because the M2 Extremely with a 76-core GPU.
He does be aware that you would be able to get 16% quicker by equipping the Mac Professional with a pair of AMD 6900 XT GPUs, however that’s not an affordable improve, and surprisingly restricted achieve for the cash.
Trevisan can also be a gamer who builds his personal high-end PCs, and he was once more impressed by the comparability.
In Rise of the Tomb Raider in 4K, the M2 Extremely did surprisingly nicely, reaching framerates of 73 fps, which was three fps quicker than the far more costly Intel Mac Professional with the Radeon Professional W6800x Duo graphics–with video games, solely one of many two GPUs is used.
Once more, he does be aware that including a pair of AMD’s top-end GPUs can push it to 85fps.
Evaluating the M2 Extremely variants of each 2023 Mac Professional and 2023 Mac Studio, he says that whereas the bigger casing and higher air flow may appear to favor the dearer machine underneath sustained load, that doesn’t appear to be the case in real-life use. The one cause to go for the Professional, he concludes, is should you want these PCIe slots.
The one internet constructive right here is the PCIe slots. That is big for anybody who needs a neat workspace with inner storage, and exterior Thunderbolt units could be cumbersome and make fan noise. It is a very affordable method for some. (Thunderbolt enclosures are additionally not low-cost, usually costing a whole bunch.) The additional $3,000 value can considerably be justified by this all-encompassing, attractive Mac Professional chassis.
In any other case, he says, the Mac Studio is basically a Mac Professional in a way more compact type issue.
A report earlier within the 12 months even discovered that some video professionals have as a substitute opted for the 16-inch MacBook Professional, because of the flexibility to work whereas on the highway.
